Emotional Contagion in User-Generated Content

Understanding Emotional Contagion in Digital Environments

Before we explore how emotions spread through user-generated content, let’s make sure we’re on the same page about what emotional contagion actually is and why it matters in our digital world.

What Is Emotional Contagion?

Emotional contagion is “the process by which a person or group influences the emotions of others through conscious or unconscious induction.” In simpler terms, it’s how we “catch” emotions from other people—just like we might catch a cold.

This phenomenon isn’t new. Throughout human history, we’ve mirrored the emotions of those around us. A smile tends to bring a smile; tears often trigger sympathy. What is new, however, is how this age-old process has moved from face-to-face interactions to digital environments, where we encounter countless emotions through screens rather than in person.

Research shows this digital emotional transfer is remarkably common. Studies suggest that up to 70% of users report experiencing mood changes after social media use, with these changes often matching the emotional tone of the content they consumed.

The User-Generated Content Ecosystem

User-generated content (UGC) refers to any content created by unpaid contributors—essentially, everyday people rather than professional content creators. This includes:

• Social media posts, comments, and stories
• Customer reviews and ratings
• Forum discussions and comments
• Blog posts from non-professional writers
• YouTube videos, TikToks, and other user-created media

The scale of UGC is staggering. Every minute, users upload 500 hours of video to YouTube, share 347,000 stories on Instagram, and send 500,000 tweets. This massive content ecosystem forms the primary way many people now express and encounter emotions online.

What makes UGC particularly powerful for emotional contagion is its authenticity. When content comes from “real people” rather than brands or professionals, we often perceive it as more genuine, making its emotional impact potentially stronger.

Theoretical Foundations

Several scientific principles help explain why emotions spread online:

• Primitive emotional contagion: Our tendency to automatically mimic and synchronize facial expressions, postures, and movements with others, leading to emotional convergence
• Social comparison: Our natural drive to evaluate ourselves by comparing our emotions and experiences to others
• Cognitive appraisal: How we interpret emotional content based on our existing beliefs and experiences

Research in this area draws from multiple disciplines, including psychology, neuroscience, computer science, and communication studies, creating a rich tapestry of understanding around digital emotional transfer.

Now that we understand what emotional contagion is, let’s take a fascinating peek inside our brains to see exactly what happens when we “catch” emotions online. The science behind this phenomenon might surprise you!

The Science Behind Digital Emotional Contagion

Have you ever wondered what actually happens in your brain when you feel happy after watching an uplifting video, or anxious after reading tense comments? The science behind emotional contagion online is truly fascinating, combining both ancient neurological systems and modern psychological processes.

What Happens in Your Brain

When you encounter emotional content online, specific brain regions activate in response:

• The amygdala, your brain’s emotional processing center, activates when you perceive emotional content, whether it’s in person or through a screen
• Mirror neurons fire both when you perform an action and when you see someone else perform that action—including emotional expressions
• The insula helps you experience empathy when you see others’ emotions

These activations trigger neurochemical responses, including releases of dopamine (associated with pleasure and reward) and oxytocin (linked to bonding and trust) when you encounter positive emotional content. Similarly, stress hormones may increase when you view negative emotional content.

Interestingly, neuroimaging studies show that while the brain processes digital and in-person emotions using similar pathways, there are subtle differences. Digital emotional processing often involves less activation in areas associated with empathy, possibly explaining why online environments can sometimes foster less empathetic interactions.

Psychological Processes at Work

Beyond brain activity, several psychological processes drive emotional contagion:

• Automatic vs. deliberative processing: We often “catch” emotions automatically, without conscious thought, especially when scrolling quickly through content
• Emotional mimicry: Even when alone, we subtly mimic the facial expressions we see on screen, which can then influence our own emotional state
• Selective attention: We naturally pay more attention to emotionally charged content, making it more likely to influence us

Individual differences also play a key role—some people are simply more susceptible to emotional contagion than others. Research suggests those with higher empathy, more emotional reactivity, or certain personality traits (like agreeableness) may be more affected by the emotions they encounter online.

What’s Different About Digital Contagion

Digital emotional contagion differs from in-person emotional transfer in several important ways:

• Missing nonverbal cues: Online interactions often lack the full range of facial expressions, tone of voice, and body language that help communicate emotions in person
• Asynchronous transmission: Unlike in-person interactions, emotions online can spread even when the creator and viewer aren’t active at the same time
• Massive scale and velocity: Digital emotions can reach millions of people in minutes, far exceeding the reach of in-person emotional contagion
• Persistence: Online emotional content can continue spreading for days, weeks, or even years after it’s created

These unique characteristics make digital emotional contagion particularly powerful and worth understanding.

With a clearer picture of what’s happening in our brains when emotions spread online, let’s look at what the research actually reveals about emotional contagion in action. The findings from major studies might challenge some of your assumptions about how emotions travel through the digital world!

Research Evidence: What Studies Tell Us

The science of emotional contagion in digital spaces has grown rapidly in recent years, with researchers conducting increasingly sophisticated studies to understand this phenomenon. Let’s explore what the evidence actually tells us about how emotions spread online.

Landmark Studies That Changed Our Understanding

Several pivotal studies have shaped our knowledge of digital emotional contagion:

• The Facebook emotional contagion study (2014) by Kramer, Guillory, and Hancock is perhaps the most famous—and controversial. Researchers manipulated the News Feeds of nearly 700,000 users, showing some more positive posts and others more negative posts. The results demonstrated that users who saw more positive content subsequently posted more positive content themselves, and vice versa for negative content.
• Twitter emotional contagion studies by Ferrara and Yang (2015) analyzed millions of tweets to demonstrate that emotional content spreads more readily than neutral content, with positive emotions generally spreading more effectively than negative ones.
• Cross-platform research has shown that emotional contagion operates differently across platforms, with image-based platforms like Instagram often showing stronger positive emotional contagion effects compared to text-based platforms.

Meta-analyses combining multiple studies suggest that the effect size of digital emotional contagion is moderate but significant—enough to influence the overall emotional climate of online spaces over time.

How Researchers Study Online Emotions

Studying emotions in digital environments presents unique challenges, leading researchers to develop several approaches:

• Observational studies analyze naturally occurring emotional content and responses without intervention
• Experimental designs manipulate emotional content exposure to measure effects
• Sentiment analysis uses algorithms to detect emotional tone in large text datasets
• Experience sampling collects real-time emotional reports from users during normal social media use

Each method has strengths and limitations, which is why the best research often combines multiple approaches for a more complete picture.

Key Findings About How Emotions Spread Online

Across multiple studies, several consistent patterns emerge:

• There is generally a linear relationship between the emotional intensity of content and its contagion effect—stronger emotions spread more readily
• Positive and negative emotions spread differently: positive emotions often spread more broadly, while negative emotions may spread more deeply within smaller groups
• Different user demographics show varying susceptibility to contagion, with some research suggesting younger users and those with higher emotional expressivity may be more susceptible
• Emotional contagion effects typically peak within 24 hours of exposure but can persist in subtle ways for much longer

One particularly interesting finding is that emotional contagion doesn’t require direct interaction—simply viewing emotional content can trigger changes in your own emotional state and subsequent expressions.

Now that we understand what the research shows about emotional contagion, let’s explore the factors that make some content more emotionally contagious than others. These insights could transform how you view—and create—online content!

What Makes Content Emotionally Contagious?

Not all online content is equally likely to spread emotions. Multiple factors influence whether and how strongly emotions transfer from content to viewers. Understanding these factors can help you both create more impactful content and become more aware of content that might be influencing your own emotions.

Content Characteristics That Amplify Emotional Spread

Certain content features make emotional contagion more likely:

• Emotional valence: Both positive and negative content can be contagious, but in different ways. Strongly positive content (inspiring stories, celebration moments) tends to spread more widely, while intensely negative content (outrage, fear) often generates deeper engagement within smaller groups.
• Emotional intensity: Content that expresses high-energy emotions (excitement, anger) typically spreads more readily than low-energy emotions (contentment, sadness).
• Content format: Visual content (especially video) generally produces stronger emotional contagion than text alone. Research suggests this hierarchy of emotional impact: video > images with text > images alone > text only.
• Language and framing: Content that uses emotional language, personal stories, or relatability triggers (“We’ve all been there…”) tends to be more contagious.

The most contagious content often combines multiple factors—like a high-energy, positive video with relatable personal storytelling.

How Platform Design Affects Emotional Spread

The platforms themselves play a major role in emotional contagion:

• Interface design: Features like one-click reactions (likes, hearts, etc.) make emotional responses easier and more frequent
• Algorithmic curation: Most platforms prioritize “engaging” content, which often means emotionally charged material
• Notification systems: Alerts about reactions and comments create feedback loops that can amplify emotional responses
• Moderation policies: How platforms handle extreme content influences the overall emotional ecosystem

These design elements can create “emotional amplification chambers” where certain emotions become increasingly concentrated and intense as content circulates.

User Factors That Influence Susceptibility

Not everyone is equally affected by emotional content:

• Individual traits: People with higher empathy, emotional expressiveness, or certain personality types (particularly extroversion and neuroticism) tend to be more susceptible
• Gender differences: Some research suggests women may show slightly higher susceptibility to emotional contagion, particularly for positive emotions
• Cultural background: Cultural norms around emotional expression influence contagion patterns
• Digital literacy: Users with greater awareness of how platforms work may be somewhat less susceptible to unintentional emotional influence

Contextual Elements That Matter

The circumstances surrounding content consumption also play a role:

• Social network structure: Emotions spread more readily through densely connected networks with strong ties
• Crisis conditions: During emergencies or major events, emotional contagion effects typically intensify
• Temporal patterns: Time of day and day of week influence emotional susceptibility, with many users showing greater emotional reactivity during evening hours and early week days
• Cultural context: Societal events and cultural moments provide frameworks that shape how emotional content is interpreted and shared

Now that we understand what makes content emotionally contagious in general, let’s explore how emotional contagion works differently across various platforms. The emotional dynamics of Twitter are quite different from Instagram or YouTube—and understanding these differences can help you navigate each space more effectively!

Emotional Contagion Across Different Platforms

If you’ve ever felt different emotions when using different social platforms, you’re not imagining things. Each platform has its own unique emotional “climate” and contagion patterns. Let’s explore how emotions spread differently across various types of user-generated content platforms.

Social Media Networks: Different Emotions for Different Platforms

Major social networks each foster distinct emotional contagion patterns:

• Facebook shows strong contagion effects for both positive and negative emotions, with research suggesting the platform’s emphasis on known connections may intensify emotional transfer. The 2014 contagion study found that reducing positive content in News Feeds led to users posting fewer positive words and more negative words.
• Twitter demonstrates rapid but relatively shallow emotional spread, with positive emotions generally reaching more users than negative ones. However, negative emotional cascades on Twitter tend to emerge more quickly during crisis events.
• Instagram exhibits particularly strong positive emotional contagion, likely due to its visual nature and cultural norms that favor aspirational, aesthetic content. Studies show that positive emotional expressions on Instagram receive approximately 24% more engagement than negative ones.
• TikTok creates intense emotional contagion through its combination of music, facial expressions, and short-form video. Its algorithm appears particularly effective at matching emotional content to susceptible viewers, creating strong emotional resonance.

Understanding these platform-specific patterns can help you both manage your own emotional exposure and more effectively reach others if you’re creating content.

Review and Opinion Platforms: Trust and Emotion

Platforms focused on reviews and opinions show unique emotional dynamics:

• Product reviews (like on Amazon) show strong negative emotional contagion—negative reviews tend to influence readers’ emotions and purchase decisions more strongly than positive ones
• Restaurant and service reviews (like Yelp) demonstrate emotional contagion that’s heavily influenced by the reviewer’s storytelling ability—emotionally vivid descriptions spread more readily to readers
• Opinion forums (like Reddit) often develop “emotional consensus” within discussions, where the initial emotional tone of comments tends to set the pattern for subsequent contributions

The perceived authenticity of the reviewer significantly impacts emotional contagion strength in these contexts. Reviews seen as genuine create stronger emotional responses than those perceived as potentially fake or incentivized.

Creative Content Communities: Creator-Audience Emotional Exchange

Creative platforms foster unique emotional relationships:

• YouTube creates complex emotional exchange between creators and viewers, with research showing creator emotional expressions in videos strongly predict comment emotions. This creates feedback loops where audience emotions influence creator content, which then affects future audience emotions.
• Blogging platforms demonstrate strong emotional transfer through narrative and vulnerability. Personal stories with emotional depth tend to create the strongest contagion effects.
• Fan fiction communities develop intense emotional bonds through shared appreciation of characters and worlds, creating strong in-group emotional synchronization.
• Gaming communities show unique emotional contagion patterns that blend competitive emotions (triumph, frustration) with social bonding.

The stronger the perceived relationship between creator and audience, the more powerful the emotional contagion effects tend to be.

Speaking of different ways we interact with content, the devices we use actually play a surprising role in emotional contagion too. Let’s explore how smartphones, laptops, and emerging technologies each create different emotional experiences!

How Devices Influence Emotional Content

The device you use to create or consume content doesn’t just change how you interact with it physically—it actually influences the emotional aspects of your digital experience. Let’s explore how different devices shape our emotional content creation and consumption.

Mobile vs. Desktop: Different Devices, Different Emotions

Research reveals interesting differences in emotional content based on device type:

• Mobile-generated content tends to be more emotionally positive than desktop-created content. Studies show smartphone-created content contains approximately 15-20% more positive emotional language than content created on desktops or laptops.
• Content length differences influence emotional depth—mobile users typically create shorter content with more immediate emotional responses, while desktop users often create longer content with more complex emotional nuance.
• Emotional emphasis patterns vary by device: mobile content more frequently uses emphatic punctuation (!!!), emoticons, and strong emotional declarations, while desktop content more often uses detailed emotional descriptions.

These differences likely stem from both physical factors (typing on a small screen encourages brevity) and contextual ones (where and when we typically use different devices).

The Cross-Device Experience

Most users interact with content across multiple devices, creating interesting patterns:

• Emotional content consumption varies by device, with studies showing people tend to have stronger emotional reactions to the same content when viewed on mobile devices compared to desktops
• Creation vs. consumption differences emerge when users create content on one device but primarily consume it on another
• Time and attention constraints associated with different devices affect emotional processing depth—mobile viewing often occurs in shorter, more distracted sessions that may amplify immediate emotional reactions while reducing deeper emotional processing

Understanding these patterns can help content creators optimize for the likely viewing experience of their audience.

Emerging Technologies and Emotional Experiences

Newer technologies are creating novel emotional contagion patterns:

• Wearable devices like smartwatches are beginning to detect and share emotional states through heart rate and other biometric data, creating potential for new forms of emotional contagion
• Voice assistants introduce emotional contagion through vocal tone and content, with research showing that the emotional tone of a voice assistant can influence the user’s subsequent emotional expressions
• Virtual and augmented reality create particularly immersive emotional experiences that may generate stronger contagion effects than traditional media
• Internet of Things (IoT) devices are beginning to enable ambient emotional content sharing through lighting, sound, and other environmental factors

These emerging technologies may significantly change how emotions spread in digital environments in coming years, potentially creating more immersive and powerful contagion effects.

Understanding how emotions spread through content is fascinating, but how do researchers actually measure and analyze these effects? Let’s look at the sophisticated tools and methods used to study emotional contagion in the digital world.

Measuring and Analyzing Emotional Contagion

Studying how emotions spread through digital content requires sophisticated methods. Let’s explore the tools and techniques researchers use to measure and understand emotional contagion in online environments.

Computational Approaches: Using Technology to Track Emotions

Researchers employ several computational methods to analyze emotional contagion at scale:

• Natural language processing (NLP) algorithms analyze text to detect emotional content, often using lexicons of emotional words or machine learning models trained to recognize emotional expressions
• Machine learning approaches identify patterns in how emotions spread through networks by analyzing vast datasets of user interactions and content
• Information diffusion models track how emotional content moves through social networks, identifying key factors that accelerate or inhibit emotional spread
• Network analysis techniques map emotional influence patterns between users, revealing how emotions flow through different types of social structures

These computational methods allow researchers to analyze millions of posts and interactions, revealing patterns that wouldn’t be visible at smaller scales.

Experimental Research Designs

Controlled experiments provide another window into emotional contagion:

• Control group studies compare users exposed to different emotional content, though establishing proper control conditions in digital environments presents unique challenges
• A/B testing approaches present different versions of content to randomly selected user groups to measure emotional response differences
• Longitudinal studies track changes in emotional expression and response over time to understand longer-term contagion effects
• Ethical experimental frameworks balance scientific inquiry with user protection, a particularly important consideration after controversies surrounding earlier emotional manipulation studies

These experimental approaches help establish causal relationships rather than just correlations, strengthening our understanding of how emotional contagion actually works.

Qualitative Assessment Approaches

Not all emotional contagion research relies on quantitative methods. Qualitative approaches include:

• User interviews that explore subjective experiences of emotional contagion, revealing nuances that automated analysis might miss
• Focus group methodologies that examine how groups collectively experience and discuss emotional content
• Digital ethnography where researchers immerse themselves in online communities to observe emotional patterns in their natural context
• Mixed-method integration that combines quantitative measures with qualitative insights for a more complete understanding

These approaches help researchers understand not just that emotional contagion occurs, but how it feels to users and what meaning they attribute to these experiences.

Now that we understand how emotional contagion works and how it’s studied, let’s explore its real-world applications and implications across different domains—from marketing to mental health and beyond. The practical impacts of this phenomenon might surprise you!

Real-World Applications and Implications

Understanding emotional contagion isn’t just academically interesting—it has practical implications across multiple domains. Let’s explore how this knowledge is applied and what it means for businesses, wellbeing, and society.

Marketing and Business Applications

Businesses are increasingly leveraging emotional contagion principles:

• Viral marketing strategies deliberately create content likely to trigger emotional contagion, with research showing that content evoking high-arousal positive emotions (awe, amusement) or high-arousal negative emotions (anger, anxiety) spreads more readily than low-arousal content
• Brand communities foster emotional connections between customers, creating environments where positive brand-related emotions can spread naturally among members
• Customer service approaches now often include emotional contagion management strategies, with companies training representatives to use positive emotional language that can spread to frustrated customers
• Business intelligence tools increasingly incorporate sentiment analysis to track emotional trends related to products and services

Companies that skillfully manage emotional contagion can create more engaging customer experiences and stronger brand relationships.

Health and Wellbeing Implications

Emotional contagion has significant implications for mental health:

• Mental health impacts of digital emotional contagion are increasingly recognized, with research showing that exposure to predominantly negative emotional content can contribute to anxiety and depression symptoms
• Online support communities leverage positive emotional contagion to create healing environments where hope, courage, and determination can spread among members
• Intervention strategies are being developed to interrupt negative emotional spirals and promote resilience in digital spaces
• Positive psychology applications use principles of emotional contagion to spread wellbeing practices and healthy emotional coping strategies

Understanding these dynamics gives individuals more control over their digital emotional experiences and helps designers create healthier online environments.

Social and Political Implications

Emotional contagion plays a significant role in broader social dynamics:

• Political discourse is heavily influenced by emotional contagion, with research showing that emotionally charged political content spreads further and faster than neutral policy discussions
• Social movements often gain momentum through emotional cascades, where powerful emotions like moral outrage or hope spread rapidly through networks
• Crisis communication effectiveness depends partly on understanding how different emotional messages will propagate through communities
• Public opinion formation increasingly involves emotional contagion processes as more discourse moves to digital spaces

These social and political applications highlight both the power of emotional contagion and the responsibility that comes with understanding it.

With great power comes great responsibility, as they say. The ability to influence emotions at scale raises important ethical questions that we need to address. Let’s explore the ethical considerations surrounding emotional contagion in digital spaces.

Ethical Considerations and Challenges

The power to influence emotions at scale comes with significant ethical responsibilities. As our understanding of emotional contagion grows, so too do concerns about its proper use and potential misuse. Let’s explore the key ethical considerations in this evolving field.

Privacy and Consent Questions

Digital emotional contagion raises important privacy concerns:

• Data collection ethics are at the forefront, as studying emotional contagion often involves analyzing personal emotional expressions without explicit consent
• Informed consent challenges arise because users typically don’t realize their emotions are being influenced by algorithmically selected content
• Transparency issues emerge when platforms don’t disclose how content is emotionally curated or how user emotional data is utilized
• User autonomy questions center on whether people should have more control over the emotional content they’re exposed to

The controversial 2014 Facebook study highlighted these concerns when researchers manipulated News Feeds to test emotional contagion without users’ knowledge, triggering widespread debate about research ethics in digital spaces.

Manipulation Concerns

The ability to influence emotions raises questions about appropriate boundaries:

• Commercial manipulation concerns arise when businesses deliberately trigger emotions to drive purchases or engagement
• Political and ideological influence through emotional contagion may affect democratic processes and social cohesion
• The line between influence and manipulation is often unclear, raising questions about when emotional contagion becomes ethically problematic
• Regulatory considerations are emerging as lawmakers consider how to address emotional manipulation in digital spaces

These concerns are particularly acute because emotional influence often happens below the level of conscious awareness, making it difficult for users to apply critical thinking.

A Framework for Responsibility

Addressing these ethical challenges requires a multi-level approach to responsibility:

• Platform responsibilities may include providing more transparency about emotional curation, offering users more control over emotional content exposure, and considering the emotional health impacts of design decisions
• Researcher guidelines need to balance advancing knowledge about emotional contagion with protecting participant wellbeing and autonomy
• User awareness and education about emotional contagion can help people make more informed choices about their digital consumption
• Ethical standards development for emotional UGC is still in early stages but increasingly necessary as our understanding of contagion effects grows

Many experts suggest that ethical approaches to emotional contagion should emphasize transparency, user control, and wellbeing as core principles.

As technology advances, our understanding of emotional contagion continues to evolve. Let’s look ahead to see where this fascinating field is heading next—and what it might mean for our digital future.

Future Directions and Emerging Research

The study of emotional contagion in digital spaces is still relatively young, with new developments emerging rapidly. Let’s explore where this fascinating field appears to be heading and what new insights might be on the horizon.

Technological Developments on the Horizon

Several technological advances are likely to transform emotional contagion research and applications:

• Real-time emotional contagion monitoring systems are being developed that could track emotional spread through networks as it happens, potentially allowing for early intervention in harmful emotional cascades
• Personalized emotional contagion protection tools might help individuals manage their exposure to different emotional content based on their current mental state and personal resilience factors
• Cross-platform emotional tracking capabilities are emerging that can follow emotional content as it moves between different social platforms, providing a more complete picture of digital emotional ecosystems
• AI-driven emotional content moderation systems are being refined to identify and potentially limit the spread of harmful emotional content while preserving freedom of expression

These technologies could make emotional contagion more visible and manageable for both individuals and communities.

Methodological Innovations

Research approaches are also evolving:

• Advanced neuroimaging techniques that work in natural digital environments could provide more detailed insights into how the brain processes emotional content in realistic settings
• Large-scale longitudinal studies tracking emotional contagion effects over months or years will help us understand long-term impacts
• Cross-cultural comparative frameworks are being developed to explore how emotional contagion differs across various cultural contexts
• Ethical experimental paradigms that balance scientific inquiry with participant wellbeing and autonomy are refining how we study emotional contagion

These methodological advances promise more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of how digital emotions spread and affect us.

Theoretical Advancements

Conceptual understanding of emotional contagion continues to evolve:

• Integrated models that combine neurological, psychological, and sociological perspectives are creating more complete frameworks for understanding digital emotional contagion
• Cross-disciplinary approaches bringing together computer science, psychology, communication studies, and ethics are yielding richer theoretical insights
• Individual differences typologies are being developed to better understand and predict who is most susceptible to different types of emotional contagion
• Developmental perspectives exploring how digital emotional learning evolves across the lifespan are emerging as important research directions

These theoretical advances will likely help us move beyond simply understanding that emotional contagion happens to comprehending why it happens and what it means for human connection in digital spaces.

Conclusion

As we’ve explored throughout this article, emotional contagion in user-generated content isn’t just an interesting psychological curiosity—it’s a powerful force shaping our digital experiences, business outcomes, and even social movements.

We’ve seen how emotions transfer through screens despite the absence of traditional in-person cues, how platform designs and device choices influence these emotional flows, and how various factors make some content more emotionally “infectious” than others.

For individuals, understanding emotional contagion offers the opportunity to become more aware of how online content affects your mood and wellbeing. This awareness can help you make more intentional choices about your digital consumption and creation habits.

For businesses and content creators, these insights provide valuable guidance for crafting content that resonates emotionally with audiences while maintaining ethical standards. The most effective approach isn’t manipulation but rather authentic emotional expression that creates genuine connection.

As digital environments continue to evolve, emotional contagion will likely remain a central element of online experience. By understanding its mechanisms, impacts, and ethical dimensions, we can work toward digital spaces that foster positive emotional exchanges while minimizing harmful effects.

Looking to boost sales for your Shopify store? The Growth Suite application helps merchants leverage emotional contagion principles through engaging product displays, customer review highlights, and personalized messaging—creating positive emotional experiences that can spread among your customers and drive growth!

References

• Ferrara, E., & Yang, Z. (2015). Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media. PLOS ONE, 10(11), e0142390.
• Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788-8790.
• Barsade, S. G. (2002). The Ripple Effect: Emotional Contagion and Its Influence on Group Behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644-675.
• Mark, T. (2024). 3 Signs Of ‘Emotional Contagion’ Via Social Media, From A Psychologist. Forbes.
• Lu, Z., & Hong, Z. (2022). Emotional Contagion: Research on the Influencing Factors of Social Media Users’ Negative Emotional Communication During the COVID-19 Epidemic. Frontiers in Psychology.
• Kamal, S., Holschuh, M., Hudepohl, E., & Perelli, A. (2016). A Study of Emotional Contagion with Virtual Characters. MDPI.
• Benhamou, A. (2015). Can robots elicit empathy? The effects of social robots’ appearance on emotional contagion. Semantic Scholar.
• Schweitzer, F., & Garcia, D. (2019). Detecting negative emotions during social media use on smartphones. Semantic Scholar.
• Goldstein, P., & Neal, D. T. (2015). More than a Feeling: Emotional Contagion Effects in Persuasive Communication. Semantic Scholar.
• Park, L. (2023). “I FEEL YOU”: EMOTIONAL CONTAGION IN MOM INFLUENCER COMMUNITIES AND ITS EFFECTS ON CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR. Semantic Scholar.
• Barreda-Ángeles, M., & Hartmann, T. (2016). R U with Some1? Using Text Message Experience Sampling to Examine Television Coviewing as a Moderator of Emotional Contagion Effects on Enjoyment. Semantic Scholar.
• Berger, J., & Packard, G. (2019). Selectively Emotional: How Smartphone Use Changes User-Generated Content. Semantic Scholar.
• Sternberg, E. (2020). An Information Diffusion Approach for Detecting Emotional Contagion in Online Social Networks. Semantic Scholar.
• Behin, S. (2017). Emotional Contagion Within Social Media. Digital Commons.
• Chen, M., & Wu, Y. (2024). The AI empathy effect: a mechanism of emotional contagion. Semantic Scholar.